Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 206-211, July 2001

The role of nuclear medicine in monitoring treatment in skeletal malignancy

  • Gary J.R. Cook

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, England
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Gary J.R. Cook, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, England.
  • ,
  • Ignac Fogelman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, England

The nuclear medicine bone scan has historically been one of the most common investigations to stage and monitor skeletal malignancy. Current guidelines for using radiographs to assess the response of skeletal metastases to systemic therapy are limited in their ability to give a timely results. Despite some minor limitations caused by the flare phenomenon, skeletal scintigraphy remains widely used for this purpose, both clinically and in trials of new cancer treatments. Nuclear medicine has also played an important role in the posttherapy evaluation of primary bone tumors, both with bone agents and nonspecific tumor agents, such as 201TI. In the future, it is possible that positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose may prove to be superior in predicting and measuring treatment response in primary and metastatic bone and bone marrow disease, but further work is required in this area.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0001-2998(01)80020-9

doi:10.1053/snuc.2001.23527

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 206-211, July 2001