Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 3-16, January 2001

The role of single photon emission computed tomography in bone imaging

  • Ismet Sarikaya

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland Medical System, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    • Trakya University Medical Faculty, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Ismet Sarikaya, MD, University of Maryland Medical System, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, 22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201.
  • ,
  • Ali Sarikaya

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland Medical System, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    • Trakya University Medical Faculty, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
  • ,
  • Lawrence E. Holder

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland Medical System, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Baltimore, MD
    • Trakya University Medical Faculty, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Edirne, Turkey

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of the bone is the second most frequently performed SPECT examination in routine nuclear medicine practice, with cardiac SPECT being the most frequent. Compared with planar scintigraphy, SPECT increases image contrast and improves lesion detection and localization. Studies have documented the unique diagnostic information provided by SPECT, particularly for avascular necrosis of the femoral head, in patients with back pain, for the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign spinal lesions, in the detection of metastatic cancer in the spine, for the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint internal derangement, and for the evaluation of acute and chronic knee pain. Although less rigorously documented, SPECT is being increasingly used in all types of situations that demand more precise anatomic localization of abnormal tracer uptake. The effectiveness of bone SPECT increases with the selection of the proper collimator, which allows one to acquire adequate counts and minimize the patient-to-detector distance. Low-energy, ultrahigh-resolution or high-resolution collimation is preferred over all-purpose collimators. Multihead gamma cameras can increase the counts obtained or shorten acquisition time, making SPECT acquisitions more practical in busy departments and also increasing image quality compared with singlehead cameras. Iterative reconstruction, with the use of ordered subsets estimation maximization, provides better quality images than classical filtered back projection algorithms. Three-dimensional image analysis often aids lesion localization.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0001-2998(01)80028-3

doi:10.1053/snuc.2001.18736

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 3-16, January 2001