Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 143-157 , April 2001

Enhanced lung scan diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with the use of ancillary scintigraphic findings and clinical correlation

    MD
  • Leonard M. Freeman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Jacobi Medical Center USA
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine Albert Einstein College of Medicine. USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Leonard M. Freeman, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, III East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467
    • ,
  • Borys Krynyckyi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Jacobi Medical Center USA
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine Albert Einstein College of Medicine. USA
    • ,
  • Lionel S. Zuckier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Jacobi Medical Center USA
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine Albert Einstein College of Medicine. USA

References 

  1. Robin ED. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of pulmonary embolism: The emperor may have no clothes. Ann Int Med. 1977;87:775–781
  2. Patton DD. The efficacy of lung scans: The emperor had clothes all along. J Nucl Med. 1985;26:812–814
  3. Juni JE, Alavi A. Lung scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: The emperor redressed. Semin Nucl Med. 1991;21:281–296
  4. Bone R. Ventilation/perfusion scan in pulmonary embolism: The emperor is incompletely attired. JAMA. 1990;263:2794–2795
  5. Biello DR, Mattar AG, McKnight RC, et al. Ventilationperfusion studies in suspected pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;133:1033–1037
  6. McNeil BJ. A diagnostic strategy using ventilation-perfusion studies in patients suspect for pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med. 1976;17:613–619
  7. The PIOPED investigators . Value of the ventilatio-perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990;263:2753–2759
  8. Gottschalk A, Sostman HD, Coleman RE, et al. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study: Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretation. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1119–1126
  9. Sostman HD, Coleman RE, Delong DM, et al. Evaluation of revised PIOPED criteria for ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Radiology. 1994;193:103–107
  10. Freitas JE, Sarosi MG, Nagle CC, et al. Modified PIOPED criteria used in clinical practice. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1573–1578
  11. McNeil BJ. Ventilation-perfusion studies and the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1980;21:319–323
  12. Miniati M, Pistolesi M, Marini C. Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Results of the prospective investigative study of acute pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PISAPED). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1387–1393
  13. Biello DR, Mattar AG, Osel-Wusu A. Interpretation of indeterminate lung scintigrams. Radiology. 1979;33:189–194
  14. Fischer KC, McNeil BJ. The indeterminate lung scan: Its characteristics and its association with pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med. 1979;4:49–53
  15. Jacobson AF, Patel N, Lewis DH. Clinical outcome of patients with intermediate probability lung scans during sixmonth followup. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1593–1596
  16. Gottschalk A. V/Q imaging and the diagnosis of PE: “Can we shift the gray to black and white?”. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1931–1932
  17. Bernard EJ, Nour R, Butler SP. The incidence of pulmonary embolism in patients with single segmental mismatch on lung scanning. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1928–1931
  18. Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. Evaluation of patients with suspected venous thromboembolism. In: Gottschalk A, Hoffer P, Potchen EJ editor. Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1988;p. 502–521
  19. In: Stedman's Medical Dictionary. ed 24. Williams & Wilkins; 1982;
  20. Tourassi GD, Floyd CE, Sostman HD, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: Artificial neural network approach to diagnosis. Radiology. 1993;189:555–558
  21. Fisher RE, Scott JA, Palmer EL. Neural networks in ventilation-perfusion imaging (Parts I and II). Radiology. 1996;198:699–713
  22. Sullivan DC, Coleman RE, Mills SR, et al. Lung scan interpretation: Effect of different observers and different criteria. Radiology. 1983;149:803–807
  23. Alderson PO. Scintigraphic diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Where do we go from here?. Radiology. 1994;193:22–23
  24. Moser KM. Venous thromboembolism. Am Rev Resp Dis. 1990;141:235–249
  25. Hull RD, Raskob GE. Low probability lung scan findings: A need for change. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:142–143
  26. Freeman LM. The low probability V/Q lung scan: Can its credibility be enhanced?. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:582–584
  27. Rosen JM, Palestro CJ, Markowitz D, et al. Significance of single ventilation/perfusion mismatches in Krypton-81m/Technetium-99m lung scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:361–365
  28. Stein PD, Relyea B, Gottschalk A: Evaluation of individual criteria for low probability interpretation of ventilation perfusion lung scan. J Nucl Med 37:577–581
  29. Friedman WF, Braunwald E. Alterations in regional pulmonary blood flow in mitral valve disease studied by radioisotope scanning. Circulation. 1966;34:363–376
  30. Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. The stripe sign: A new sign for nondiagnosis of nonembolic defects on pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1982;142:737–741
  31. Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. Prospective validation of the stripe sign in ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1992;184:455–459
  32. Freitas JE, Sansi MG, Nagle CG, et al. Modified PIOPED criteria used in clinical practice. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1573–1578
  33. James AE, Conway JJ, Chang CH, et al. The fissure sign: Its multiple causes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1971;111:492–500
  34. Gize R, Dixon M, Mishkin F. Analysis of the fissure sign. J Nucl Med. 1971;12:822–824
  35. Sostman HD, Brown M, Toote A, et al. Perfusion scan in pulmonary vascular/lymphangitic carcinomatosis: The segmental contour pattern. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137:1072–1074
  36. Green N, Swanson L, Kern W, et al. Lymphangitic carcinomatosis: Lung scan abnormalities. J Nucl Med. 1976;17:258–260
  37. Green N, Kern W, Lewis R, et al. Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of the lung: Pathologtic diagnostic, and therapeutic considerations. Int Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1977;2:149–153
  38. Pendergrass HP, Neel HS, Clement PB, et al. Lung perfusion pattern associated with widespread occlusion of the pulmonary vessels and lymphatics. Radiology. 1972;105:615–616
  39. Eaton SB, James AE, Potsaid MS, et al. Scintigraphic findings in pulmonary microembolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1969;106:778–786
  40. Crane R, Rudd TG, Dall D. Tumor microembolism: Pulmonary perfusion pattern. J Nucl Med. 1984;25:877–880
  41. Bedont RA, Datz FL. Lung perfusion defects limited to matching pleural effusions. Low probability of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145:1155–1157
  42. (abstr) Gottschalk A, Stein PD. Lung scan perfusion defects limited to matching pleural effusions indicate a low probability of pulmonary embolism but do not confidently exclude the diagnosis. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:951
  43. Goldberg SN, Richardson DD, Palmer EL, et al: Pleural effusions and ventilation/perfusion scan interpretation for acute pulmonary embolus. J Nucl Med 37:1310–1311
  44. Worsley DF, Kim CK, Alavi A, et al. Detailed analysis of patients with matched ventilation-perfusion defects and chest radiographic opacities. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1851–1853
  45. Kim CK, Worsley DF, Alavi A. Ventilation-perfusionchest radiography match is less likely to represent pulmonary embolism if perfusion is decreased, rather than absent. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25:665–669
  46. Strauss EB, Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. Radiographic parenchymal opacity, matching perfusion defect, and normal ventilation. A sign of pulmonary embolus?. Radiology. 1987;163:505–506
  47. Speis WG, Burstein SP, Dillehay GL, et al. Ventilation perfusion scintigraphy in suspected pulmonary embolus: Correlation with pulmonary angiography and refinement of criteria for interpretation. Radiology. 1986;159:383–390
  48. White RI, James AE, Wagner HN. The significance of unilateral absence of pulmonary artery perfusion by lung scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1971;111:501–509
  49. Tomsick TA, Holder LE. Unilateral absent perfusion of the lung. JAMA. 1975;234:89–90
  50. Cho S-R, Tsnado J, Cockrell CH, et al. Angiographic evaluation of patients with unilateral massive perfusion defects in the lung scan. Radiographics. 1987;7:729–745
  51. Fuentes RT, Holmes RA. Reverse radioaerosol/radioperfusion distribution in pulmonary endobronchial obstruction. Clin Nucl Med. 1990;15:217–221
  52. Carvalho P, Lavender JP. The incidence and etiology of the ventilation/perfusion reverse mismatch. Clin Nucl Med. 1989;14:571–576
  53. Li DJ, Stewart I, Miles KA, et al. Scintigraphic appearances in patients with pulmonary infection and lung scintigrams of intermediate or low probability for pulmonary embolism. Clin Nucl Med. 1994;19:1091–1093
  54. Alderson PO, Dzebolo NN, Biello DR, et al. Serial lung scintigraphy: Utility in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Radiology. 1973;149:797–802
  55. Wartski M, Collignon MA Thesee Study Group. Incomplete recovery of lung perfusion after 3 months in patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with antithrombic agents. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1043–1048
  56. Gottschalk A. The chronic perfusion defect: Our knowledge is still hazy, but the message is clear. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1049–1050
  57. Schober B. Do recurrent pulmonary emboli lodge preferentially in prior foci?. J Nucl Med. 1980;21:659–661
  58. Moser KM, Fedullo PF, Litte John JK, et al. Frequent asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis. JAMA. 1994;271:223–225
  59. Gray HW, McKillop JH, Bessent RG. Lung scan reporting language. What does it mean?. Nucl Med Commun. 1993;14:1084–1087
  60. Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Henry JW, et al. Stratification of patients according to prior cardiopulmonary disease and probability assessment based on the number of mismatched segmental equivalents. Chest. 1993;104:1461–1467
  61. Stein PD, Gottschalk A. The addition of clinical assessment to stratification according to prior cardiopulmonary disease further optimizes the interpretation of ventilation perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1993;104:1472–1476
  62. Morrell NW, Nijran KS, Jones BE, et al. The underestimation of segmental defect size in radionuclide lung scanning. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:370–374
  63. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. Mismatched vascular defects: An easy alternative to mismatched segmental equivalent defects for the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1993;104:1468–1472
  64. Gray HW, McKillop JH, Bessent RG. Lung scan reports: Interpretation by clinicians. Nucl Med Commun. 1993;14:989–994
  65. Lee ME, Biello DR, Kumar B, et al. “Low probability” ventilation-perfusion seintigrams: Clinical outcomes in 99 patients. Radiology. 1985;156:497–500
  66. Smith R, Maher JM, Miller RI, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and lowprobability aerosol-perfusion scintigrams. Radiology. 1987;164:731–733
  67. Kahn D, Bushnell DL, Dean R, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with a “low probability” of pulmonary embolism on ventilation-perfusion lung scan. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:377–379
  68. Rajendran JG, Jacobson AF. Review of 6-month mortality following low probability lung scans. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:349–352

PII: S0001-2998(01)80042-8

doi: 10.1053/snuc.2001.21273

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 143-157 , April 2001

Article Tools