Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 35-46, January 2002

Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer*

  • Roland Hustinx

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Centre hospitalier universitaire, Liège, Belgium
    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
    • Division of Nuclear Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
  • ,
  • François Bénard

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Centre hospitalier universitaire, Liège, Belgium
    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
    • Division of Nuclear Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
  • ,
  • Abass Alavi

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Centre hospitalier universitaire, Liège, Belgium
    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
    • Division of Nuclear Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Abass Alavi, MD, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 110 Donner Bldg, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA.

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is increasingly used for the management of patients with cancer. The technique is now well accepted by most physicians as an effective complement to the existing imaging modalities. For many malignancies, PET achieves high sensitivity and specificity. The critical role of this powerful technique is realized increasingly in the day-to-day practice of oncology. This is particularly true for the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The contribution of PET for the selection of patients eligible for curative treatments in this setting is well established. Convincing data also exist to support the use of PET for evaluating patients with recurrent colorectal carcinoma, for staging and restaging lymphomas, and for diagnosing recurrent thyroid carcinoma in the presence of elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scans. Other indications include staging of various recurrent malignancies, such as breast cancer, melanoma, and head and neck and gynecologic carcinomas. Existing data are limited for the determination of the impact of PET in certain malignancies, and further studies, which should include outcome information, will allow clarification of the role of this modality for such indications. Despite the small number of studies specifically designed to assess changes in management plans for some malignancies after performing PET the overall favorable results are encouraging enough at this time to include this modality as an essential element of the practice of modern oncology. Finally, the evolving role of PET imaging as a predictor of response after local or systemic treatment may add a major dimension to the application of this novel technique.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

* Supported in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research under the clinician-scientist award program (F.B.).

PII: S0001-2998(02)80038-1

doi:10.1053/snuc.2002.29272

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 35-46, January 2002