Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 166-179, July 2003

X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners☆☆

University of Washington, Seattle, WA; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University Hospital of Essen, Germany

Abstract 

A synergy of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanners is the use of the CT data for x-ray-based attenuation correction of the PET emission data. Current methods of measuring transmission use positron sources, gamma-ray sources, or x-ray sources. Each of the types of transmission scans involves different trade-offs of noise versus bias, with positron transmission scans having the highest noise but lowest bias, whereas x-ray scans have negligible noise but the potential for increased quantitative errors. The use of x-ray-based attenuation correction, however, has other advantages, including a lack of bias introduced from post-injection transmission scanning, which is an important practical consideration for clinical scanners, as well as reduced scan times. The sensitivity of x-ray-based attenuation correction to artifacts and quantitative errors depends on the method of translating the CT image from the effective x-ray energy of ~70 keV to attenuation coefficients at the PET energy of 511 keV. These translation methods are usually based on segmentation and/or scaling techniques. Errors in the PET emission image arise from positional mismatches caused by patient motion or respiration differences between the PET and CT scans; incorrect calculation of attenuation coefficients for CT contrast agents or metallic implants; or keeping the patient's arms in the field of view, which leads to truncation and/or beam-hardening (or x-ray scatter) artifacts. Proper interpretation of PET emission images corrected for attenuation by using the CT image relies on an understanding of the potential artifacts. In cases where an artifact or bias is suspected, careful inspection of all three available images (CT and PET emission with and without attenuation correction) is recommended. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address reprint requests to: Corresponding author: Paul Kinahan, PhD, University of Washington Medical Center, Box 356004, RM NW040, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195-6004.

☆☆ This work was supported by NIH grant CA74135 from the National Cancer Institute.

 0001-2998/03/3303-0001$30.00/0

PII: S0001-2998(03)70003-8

doi:10.1053/snuc.2003.127307

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 166-179, July 2003