Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 219-227, July 2003

Display of fused images: Methods, interpretation, and diagnostic improvements☆☆

Departments of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Diagnostic Radiology Yale University Medical School, New Haven, CT; and Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract 

The use of integrated visualization for medical images aims at assisting clinicians in the difficult task of mentally translating and integrating medical image data from multiple sources into a three-dimensional (3D) representation of the patient. This interpretation of the enormous amount and complexity of contemporary, multiparameter, and multimodal image data demands efficient methods for integrated presentation. This article reviews methods for fused display with the main focus on integration of functional with anatomical images. First, an overview of integrated two-dimensional (2D) and 3D medical image display techniques is presented, and topics related to the interpretation of the integrated images are discussed. Then we address the key issue for clinical acceptance, ie, whether these novel visualization techniques lead to diagnostic improvements. Methods for fused display appear to be powerful tools to assist the clinician in the retrieval of relevant information from multivariate medical image data. Evaluation of the different methods for fused display indicates that the diagnostic process improves, notably as concerns the anatomical localization (typically of functional processes), the registration procedure, enhancement of signal, and efficiency of information presentation (which increases speed of interpretation and comprehension). Consequently, fused display improves communication with referring specialists, increases confidence in the observations, and facilitates the intra- and intersubject comparison of a large part of the data from the different sources, thereby simplifying the extraction of additional, valuable information. In most diagnostic tasks the clinician is served best by providing several (interactive and flexible) 2D and 3D methods for fused display for a thorough assessment of the wealth of image information from multiple sources. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address reprint requests to Dr. R. Stokking, Medical Informatics and Radiology, Ee2167, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

☆☆ This research was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health, Grant No. R01-S35674.

 0001-2998/03/3303-0015$30.00/0

PII: S0001-2998(03)70007-5

doi:10.1053/snuc.2003.127311

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 219-227, July 2003