Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 186-196, July 2005

Evaluation of Therapy for Lymphoma

  • Guy Jerusalem, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Guy Jerusalem, MD, PhD, Medical Oncology, CHU Sart Tilman, B35, B-4000 - Liege 1, Belgium.
  • ,
  • Roland Hustinx, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • ,
  • Yves Beguin, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • ,
  • Georges Fillet, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is the best noninvasive imaging technique for to assess response in patients suffering from lymphoma. Early response evaluation (“interim PET”) after one, a few cycles, or at midtreatment can predict response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. We calculated from data of 7 studies an overall sensitivity to predict treatment failure of 79%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 81%, and an accuracy of 85%. Although it is not yet indicated to change patient management based on residual 18F-FDG uptake on interim scan in chemotherapy-sensitive patients, prospective studies evaluating the role of an interim PET in patient management clearly are warranted. 18F-FDG PET also has an important prognostic role in relapsing patients after reinduction chemotherapy before high-dose chemotherapy (HCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, all chemotherapy-sensitive patients remain candidates for HCT followed by ASCT, even if 18F-FDG PET showed residual 18F-FDG uptake. We calculated from data of 3 studies an overestimated risk of relapse in 16% of all PET-positive patients. Some patients with residual 18F-FDG uptake will have a good outcome after HCT followed by ASCT. 18F-FDG PET is the imaging technique of choice for end-of-treatment evaluation. However, 18F-FDG is not specific for tumoral tissue. Active inflammatory lesions and infectious processes can be falsely interpreted as malignant residual cells. However, a negative 18F-FDG PET cannot exclude minimal residual disease. Consequently, it is always indicated to correlate PET findings with clinical data, other imaging modalities, and/or a biopsy. We calculated, from data of 17 studies in end-of-treatment evaluation, a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 94%, a PPV of 82%, a NPV 92%, and an accuracy of 89%.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0001-2998(05)00014-0

doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2005.02.004

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 186-196, July 2005