Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 36, Issue 1 , Pages 73-92, January 2006

The Role of Fluorodeoxyglucose, 18F-Dihydroxyphenylalanine, 18F-Choline, and 18F-Fluoride in Bone Imaging with Emphasis on Prostate and Breast

  • Werner Langsteger, MD (FACE)

      Affiliations

    • PET–CT Center Linz, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Linz, Austria.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Werner Langsteger, MD, PET–CT Center Linz, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Seilerstaette 4, A-4020, Linz, Austria.
  • ,
  • Martin Heinisch, MD

      Affiliations

    • PET–CT Center Linz, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Linz, Austria.
  • ,
  • Ignac Fogelman, BSc, MD (FRCP)

      Affiliations

    • Division of Imaging, King’s College, London, UK.

Diagnostic imaging has played a major role in the evaluation of patients with bone metastases. The imaging modalities have included bone scintigraphy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and most recently PET/CT, which can be performed with different tracers, including fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), 18F-fluoride, 18F-choline (FCH), and 18F-DOPA (dihydroxyphenylalanine). For most tumors the sensitivity of FDG in detecting bone metastases is similar to bone scintigraphy; additionally it can be used to monitor the response to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. 18F-Fluoride may provide a more sensitive “conventional” bone scan and is superior for FDG nonavid tumors, but, nevertheless, FDG in “early disease” often has clear advantages over 18F-fluoride. Although more data need to be obtained, it appears that FCH is highly efficient in preoperative management regarding N and M staging of prostate cancer once metastatic disease is strongly suspected or documented. For neuroendocrine tumors and in particular in medullary thyroid cancer, DOPA is similar to 18F-fluoride in providing high quality information regarding the skeleton. Nevertheless, prospective studies with large patient groups will be essential to define the exact diagnostic role of FCH and DOPA PET in different clinical settings.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0001-2998(05)00056-5

doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2005.09.002

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 36, Issue 1 , Pages 73-92, January 2006