Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 129-136, March 2008

Technical Aspects of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Fusion Planning

  • Jacqueline Brunetti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, NJ.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Jacqueline Brunetti, MD, Department of Radiology, Holy Name Hospital, 718 Teaneck Road, Teaneck, NJ 07666.
  • ,
  • Allan Caggiano, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, NJ.
  • ,
  • Benjamin Rosenbluth, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, NJ.
  • ,
  • Charles Vialotti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, NJ.

Emerging technologies in radiation therapy computers and delivery systems allow surgically precise conformal radiation treatment that was not possible with previous generations of equipment. The newest treatment systems can compensate for tumor target motion as well as shape dose distributions to conform precisely to delineated target volumes. These sophisticated technologies now drive the development of imaging modalities able to generate equally high-resolution and lesion-specific roadmaps that are the foundation of these highly accurate radiation plans. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is currently becoming a routine imaging tool for radiation oncology because of its combined benefits of positron imaging and high-resolution anatomic display. The improved staging and lesion delineation provided by PET, combined with the 3D anatomic display provided by CT, now allows better treatment stratification and more precise targeting. Additionally, respiratory-gated 4D CT and 4D PET/CT have been used in the simulation process for respiratory-gated radiation therapy. Successful integration of PET/CT into the radiation therapy planning process requires an understanding of how therapy plans are derived and the process by which the patient receives therapy, because these dictate the method of image acquisition. The radiation oncologists, too, must understand the technology of positron imaging to adapt these functional images based on intensities rather than pixels to their targeting process. Modifications to the PET/CT scanner and room are necessary to image the patient in the reproducible position required for treatment planning. Although the impact of these efforts on patient outcome has yet to be determined, the benefit of better treatment choice, due to improved staging, and more precise targeting with less normal tissue exposure resulting in improved quality of life will likely promote PET/CT to the gold-standard for targeted therapies.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0001-2998(07)00139-0

doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.11.001

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 2 , Pages 129-136, March 2008