Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 209-222 , May 2008

Small-Animal Preclinical Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation and Methodology

  • Douglas J. Rowland, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Douglas J. Rowland, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, CA 95616.
    • ,
  • Simon R. Cherry, PhD

References 

  1. The Human Genome (Science Genome Map). Science. 2001;291:1218
  2. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409:860–921
  3. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002;420:520–562
  4. Malakoff D. Suppliers: The rise of the mouse, biomedicine’s model mammal. Science. 2000;288:248–253
  5. Maglione JE, Moghanaki D, Young LJT, et al. Transgenic Polyoma Middle-T Mice Model Premalignant Mammary Disease. Cancer Res. 2001;61:8298–8305
  6. Abbey CK, Borowsky AD, McGoldrick ET, et al. In vivo positron-emission tomography imaging of progression and transformation in a mouse model of mammary neoplasia. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:11438–11443
  7. Blackstock WP, Weir MP. Proteomics: Quantitative and physical mapping of cellular proteins. Trends Biotechnol. 1999;17:121–127
  8. Rudin M, Rausch M, Stoeckli M. Molecular imaging in drug discovery and development: Potential and limitations of nonnuclear methods. Mol Imaging Biol. 2005;7:5–13
  9. Zhang SJ, Wu JC. Comparison of imaging techniques for tracking cardiac stem cell therapy. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1916–1919
  10. Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Physics in Nuclear Medicine. (ed 3). Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003;
  11. Volkert WA, Goeckeler WF, Ehrhardt GJ, et al. Therapeutic radionuclides: Production and decay property considerations. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:174–185
  12. Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Mullani NA, et al. Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography. J Nucl Med. 1975;16:210–224
  13. Jansen FP, Vanderheyden J-L. The future of SPECT in a time of PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:733–735
  14. Beekman FJ, McElroy DP, Berger F, et al. Towards in vivo nuclear microscopy: Iodine-125 imaging in mice using micro-pinholes. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:933–938
  15. Beekman FJ, van der Have F, Vastenhouw B, et al. U-SPECT-I: A novel system for submillimeter-resolution tomography with radiolabeled molecules in mice. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1194–1200
  16. Furenlid LR, Wilson DW, Yi-chun C, et al. FastSPECT II: A second-generation high-resolution dynamic SPECT imager. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2004;51:631–635
  17. McElroy DP, MacDonald LR, Beekman FJ, et al. Performance evaluation of A-SPECT: A high resolution desktop pinhole SPECT system for imaging small animals. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2002;49:2139–2147
  18. Schramm NU, Ebel G, Engeland U, Schurrat T, et al. High-resolution SPECT using multipinhole collimation. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2003;50:315–320
  19. Schellingerhout D, Accorsi R, Mahmood U, et al. Coded aperture nuclear scintigraphy: A novel small animal imaging technique. Mol Imaging. 2002;1:344–353
  20. Forrer F, Valkema R, Bernard B, et al. In vivo radionuclide uptake quantification using a multi-pinhole SPECT system to predict renal function in small animals. Euro J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1214–1217
  21. Meikle SR, Fulton RR, Eberl S, et al. An investigation of coded aperture imaging for small animal SPECT. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2001;48:816–821
  22. Meikle SR, Kench P, Weisenberger AG, et al. A prototype coded aperture detector for small animal SPECT. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2002;49:2167–2171
  23. Smith MF, Meikle SR, Majewski S, Weisenberger AG. Design of multipinhole collimators for small animal SPECT. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2003 IEEE. 2003;4:2291–2295
  24. Schramm NU, Lackas C, Hoppin J, et al. On the performance of two multi-pinhole SPECT systems for small animal research. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2004 IEEE. 2004;5:2823–2824
  25. Kastis GA, Furenlid LR, Wilson DW, et al. Compact CT/SPECT small-animal imaging system. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2004;51:63–67
  26. El Fakhri G, Mahmood A, Ouyang J, et al. Quantitative simultaneous dual isotope micro-SPECT in the small animal. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:231P;(abstr)
  27. Wagenaar DJ, Zhang J, Kazules T, et al. In Vivo Dual-Isotope SPECT Imaging with Improved Energy Resolution. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2006 IEEE. 2006;6:3821–3826
  28. Cherry SR, Shao Y, Silverman RW, et al. MicroPET: A high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 1997;44:1161–1166
  29. Lecomte R, Cadorette J, Rodrigue S, et al. Initial results from the Sherbrooke avalanche photodiode positron tomograph. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 1996;43:1952–1957
  30. Kim JS, Lee JS, Im KC, et al. Performance measurement of the microPET Focus 120 scanner. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1527–1535
  31. Yang Y, Tai YC, Siegel S, et al. Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:2527–2545
  32. Lewellen TK, Janes M, Miyaoka RS, et al. System integration of the MiCES small animal PET scanner. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2004 IEEE. 2004;5:3316–3320
  33. Kim H, Furenlid LR, Crawford MJ, et al. SemiSPECT: A small-animal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imager based on eight cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detector arrays. Med Phys. 2006;33:465–474
  34. Studen A, Burdette D, Chesi E, et al. First coincidences in pre-clinical Compton camera prototype for medical imaging. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A. 2004;531:258–264
  35. Park SJ, Rogers WL, Clinthorne NH. Design of a very high-resolution small animal PET scanner using a silicon scatter detector insert. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:4653–4677
  36. Park SJ, Rogers WL, Huh S, et al. Performance evaluation of a very high resolution small animal PET imager using silicon scatter detectors. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:2807–2826
  37. Stickel JR, Qi J, Cherry SR. Fabrication and characterization of a 0.5-mm lutetium oxyorthosilicate detector array for high-resolution PET applications. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:115–121
  38. Beekman F, Vastenhouw B. Design and simulation of a high-resolution stationary SPECT system for small animals. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:4579–4592
  39. Chatziioannou A. Molecular imaging of small animals with dedicated PET tomographs. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:98–114
  40. Zanzonico P. Positron emission tomography: A review of basic principles, scanner design and performance, and current systems. Semin Nucl Med. 2004;34:87–111
  41. Shah KS, Grazioso R, Farrell R, et al. Position sensitive APDs for small Animal PET imaging. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2004;51:91–95
  42. Ling T, Lewellen TK, Miyaoka RS. Depth of interaction decoding of a continuous crystal detector module. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:2213–2228
  43. Yang Y, Purushottam AD, Robert WS, et al. Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:2131
  44. Moehrs S, Del Guerra A, Herbert DJ, Mandelkern MA. A detector head design for small-animal PET with silicon photomultipliers (SiPM). Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:1113–1127
  45. Merck C, Holl P, Laatiaoui M, et al. Timing properties of an avalanche diode for single photon counting. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A. 2006;567:272–275
  46. McElroy DP, Saveliev V, Reznik A, Rowlands JA. Evaluation of silicon photomultipliers: A promising new detector for MR compatible PET. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A. 2007;571:106–109
  47. Chow PL, Stout DB, Komisopoulou E, et al. A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:379–390
  48. Vandervoort E, Camborde ML, Jan S, et al. Monte Carlo modelling of singles-mode transmission data for small animal PET scanners. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:3169–3184
  49. Chow PL, Rannou FR, Chatziioannou AF. Attenuation correction for small animal PET tomographs. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:1837–1850
  50. Hwang AB, Hasegawa BH. Attenuation correction for small animal SPECT imaging using x-ray CT data. Med Phys. 2005;32:2799–2804
  51. Teo B-K, Seo Y, Bacharach SL, et al. Partial-volume correction in PET: Validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:802–810
  52. Laforest R, Sharp TL, Engelbach JA, et al. Measurement of input functions in rodents: Challenges and solutions. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:679–685
  53. Toyama H, Ichise M, Liow J-S, et al. Evaluation of anesthesia effects on [18F]FDG uptake in mouse brain and heart using small animal PET. Nucl Med Bio. 2004;31:251–256
  54. Sharp TL, Dence CS, Engelbach JA, et al. Techniques necessary for multiple tracer quantitative small-animal imaging studies. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:875–884
  55. Schiffer WK, Mirrione MM, Dewey SL. Optimizing experimental protocols for quantitative behavioral imaging with 18F-FDG in rodents. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:277–287
  56. Fueger BJ, Czernin J, Hildebrandt I, et al. Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:999–1006
  57. Dandekar M, Tseng JR, Gambhir SS. Reproducibility of 18F-FDG microPET studies in mouse tumor xenografts. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:602–607
  58. Vanhove C, Lahoutte T, Defrise M, et al. Reproducibility of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements in rat using pinhole gated SPECT. Eur J Nucl Medi Mol Imaging. 2005;32:211–220
  59. Berger F, Lee Y-P, Loening A, et al. Whole-body skeletal imaging in mice utilizing microPET: Optimization of reproducibility and applications in animal models of bone disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1225–1236
  60. Tseng JR, Dandekar M, Subbarayan M, et al. Reproducibility of 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine microPET studies in tumor xenografts in mice. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1851–1857
  61. Scheibe PO. Number of samples—hypothesis testing. Nucl Med Bio. 2008;35:3–9
  62. Eckelman WC, Kilbourn MR, Joyal JL, et al. Justifying the number of animals for each experiment. Nucl Medi Biol. 2007;34:229–232
  63. Eckelman WC. Further discussions on choosing the number of animals for an experiment. Nucl Medi Biol. 2008;35:1–2
  64. Funk T, Sun M, Hasegawa BH. Radiation dose estimate in small animal SPECT and PET. Med Phys. 2004;31:2680–2686
  65. Stabin MG, Peterson TE, Holburn GE, et al. Voxel-based mouse and rat models for internal dose calculations. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:655–659
  66. Taschereau R, Chatziioannou AF. Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed dose in a mouse phantom from 18-fluorine compounds. Med Phys. 2007;34:1026–1036
  67. Taschereau R, Chow PL, Chatziioannou AF. Monte Carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging procedures in a realistic mouse phantom. Med Phys. 2006;33:216–224
  68. Kolbert KS, Watson T, Matei C, et al. Murine S factors for liver, spleen, and kidney. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:784–791
  69. Chen SL, Cai L, Meng QY, et al. Low-Dose Whole-Body Irradiation (LD-WBI) changes protein expression of mouse thymocytes: effect of a LD-WBI-enhanced protein RIP10 on cell proliferation and spontaneous or radiation-induced thymocyte apoptosis. Toxicol Sci. 2000;55:97–106
  70. Li W, Wang G, Cui J, Xue L, Cai L. Low-dose radiation (LDR) induces hematopoietic hormesis: LDR-induced mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells into peripheral blood circulation. Exp Hematol. 2004;32:1088–1096
  71. Liu S-Z. On radiation hormesis expressed in the immune system. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2003;33:431–441
  72. Mitchel REJ, Jackson JS, Morrison DP, et al. Low doses of radiation increase the latency of spontaneous lymphomas and spinal osteosarcomas in cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice. Radiat Res. 2003;159:320–327
  73. Prise KM, Folkard M, Michael BD. A review of the bystander effect and its implications for low-dose exposure. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2003;104:347–355
  74. Samarth RM, Kumar A. Radioprotection of Swiss albino mice by plant extract Mentha piperita (Linn.). J Radiat Res. 2003;44:101–109
  75. Adonai N, Nguyen KN, Walsh J, et al. Ex vivo cell labeling with 64Cu-pyruvaldehyde-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) for imaging cell trafficking in mice with positron-emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:3030–3035
  76. Goertzen AL, Suk JY, Thompson CJ. Imaging of weak-source distributions in LSO-based small-animal PET scanners. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1692–1698
  77. Kung MP, Kung HF. Mass effect of injected dose in small rodent imaging by SPECT and PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:673–678
  78. Huang S-C, Wu H-M, Shoghi-Jadid K, et al. Investigation of a new input function validation approach for dynamic mouse microPET studies. Mol Imaging Biol. 2004;6:34–46
  79. Kim J, Herrero P, Sharp T, et al. Minimally invasive method of determining blood input function from pet images in rodents. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:330–336
  80. Meyer P, Circiumaru V, Cardi C, et al. Simplified quantification of small animal [18F]FDG PET studies using a standard arterial input function. Eur J Nucl Medicine Mol Imaging. 2006;33:948–954
  81. Pain F, Laniece P, Mastrippolito R, et al. Arterial input function measurement without blood sampling using a β-microprobe in rats. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1577–1582
  82. Reymond J-M, Guez D, Kerhoas S, et al. Development of an instrument for time-activity curve measurements during PET imaging of rodents. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A. 2007;571:358–361
  83. Shimoji K, Ravasi L, Schmidt K, et al. Measurement of cerebral glucose metabolic rates in the anesthetized rat by dynamic scanning with 18F-FDG, the ATLAS small animal PET scanner, and arterial blood sampling. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:665–672
  84. Wu H-M, Sui G, Lee C-C, et al. In vivo quantitation of glucose metabolism in mice using small-animal PET and a microfluidic device. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:837–845
  85. Yamamoto S, Tarutani K, Suga M, et al. Development of a phoswich detector for a continuous blood-sampling system. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2001;48:1408–1411
  86. Shoghi KI, Rowland DJ, Laforest R, et al. Characterization of spillover and recovery coefficients in the gated mouse heart for non-invasive extraction of input function in microPET studies: Feasibility and sensitivity analysis. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2006 IEEE. 2006;4:2134–2136
  87. Shoghi KI, Welch MJ. Hybrid image and blood sampling input function for quantification of small animal dynamic PET data. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:989–994
  88. Janecek M, Wu H, Tai YC. High-resolution insert for clinical whole body PET scanners (Design and optimization). Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2004 IEEE. 2004;6:3849–3852
  89. Pal D, Yuan-Chuan T, Janecek M, et al: Linear and iterative reconstruction algorithms for a novel PET-insert scanner. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2005 IEEE. DOI:10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596711
  90. Wu H, Janecek M, Pal D, O’Sullivan JA, Tai YC. Experimental evaluation of PET inserts on reducing the acolinearity effect and improving image resolution. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2005 IEEE. 2005;5:3002–3004
  91. Debashish P, Joseph AOS, Heyu W, et al. 2D linear and iterative reconstruction algorithms for a PET-insert scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2007;4293
  92. Woody C, Vaska P, Schlyer D, et al. Initial studies using the RatCAP conscious animal PET tomograph. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A. 2007;571:14–17
  93. Weisenberger AG, Gleason SS, Goddard J, et al. A restraint-free small animal SPECT imaging system with motion tracking. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans. 2005;52:638–644
  94. Rowland DJ, Garbow JR, Laforest R, Snyder AZ. Registration of [18F]FDG microPET and small-animal MRI. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:567–572
  95. Zaidi H, Mawlawi O, Orton CG. Simultaneous PET/MR will replace PET/CT as the molecular multimodality imaging platform of choice. Med Phys. 2007;34:1525–1528
  96. Judenhofer MS, Catana C, Swann BK, et al. PET/MR images acquired with a compact MR-compatible PET Detector in a 7-T magnet. Radiology. 2007;244:807–814
  97. Pichler BJ, Judenhofer MS, Catana C, et al. Performance test of an LSO-APD detector in a 7-T MRI scanner for simultaneous PET/MRI. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:639–647
  98. Catana C, Wu Y, Judenhofer MS, et al. Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR Images: initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1968–1976

PII: S0001-2998(08)00023-8

doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.01.004

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 209-222 , May 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution