Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Next Generation of Multimodality Imaging?

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.02.001Get rights and content

Multimodal imaging is now well-established in routine clinical practice. Especially in the field of nuclear medicine, new positron emission tomography (PET) installations comprise almost exclusively combined PET/computed tomography (CT) scanners rather than PET-only systems. However, PET/CT has certain notable shortcomings, including the inability to perform simultaneous data acquisition and the significant radiation dose to the patient contributed by CT. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers, compared with CT, better contrast among soft tissues as well as functional-imaging capabilities. Therefore, the combination of PET with MRI provides many advantages that go far beyond simply combining functional PET information with structural MRI information. Many technical challenges, including possible interference between these modalities, have to be solved when combining PET and MRI, and various approaches have been adapted to resolving these issues. Here, we present an overview of current working prototypes of combined PET/MRI scanners from different groups. In addition, besides PET/MRI images of mice, the first such images of a rat acquired with the first commercial clinical PET/MRI scanner, are presented. The combination of PET and MRI is a promising tool in preclinical research and will certainly progress to clinical application.

Section snippets

The Limitations of PET/CT and the Potential of PET/MRI

Although PET/CT is rapidly becoming a critical component of clinical diagnoses, it has certain limitations, largely related to the fact that the CT and PET scans are acquired sequentially rather than simultaneously. Especially problematic are artifacts caused by intra- and interscan patient and organ motion in addition to the differences between the breathing protocols used in PET and CT. These artifacts affect the accuracy of the registration and attenuation correction, seriously compromising

Technical Challenges of Combined PET and MRI

Combining 2 advanced imaging technologies without degrading the original optimum performance of either is challenging. PET and MRI are 2 such modalities that route and otherwise process electronic signal pulses that are prone to distortion. Besides avoiding any such signal distortion and associated degradation of performance when combining PET and MRI, the main challenges of merging the hardware into a single device are space constraints and the fact that conventional PET detectors21 are based

Different Approaches for Combined PET and MRI

There are different conceivable options for combining PET and MR. The easiest and most straightforward approach would be the placement of the 2 scanners in series in a manner analogous to current PET/CT scanners (Fig. 2A). However, this approach would require significant modifications, especially of the PET detectors to make them insensitive to the magnetic fields and to construct them in such a way as to negligibly affect the performance of the MRI scanner. As with the approach to PET/CT,

Applications of Combined PET/MRI

Considering the fact that the full integration of PET/MRI is technically feasible without compromising the performance of either of the individual modalities, PET/MRI offers considerable potential for novel imaging applications far beyond simply correlation of functional and anatomic images. First, performance evaluation tests have shown that the combination of PET/MRI allows the simultaneous acquisition of multifunctional data such as PET tracer uptake, MR spectroscopy, or fMRI along with

PET/MRI in Preclinical Research

High-resolution small-animal CT exposes the rodents to a significantly high radiation doses than those associated with clinical CT and, for vascular contrast-based imaging, requires relatively large amounts of dedicated iodine-based media to improve visualization and discrimination of soft tissues. Thus, other than for bone and lung, CT is generally not the modality of choice for anatomic imaging of small laboratory animals. Combining PET/MRI, thereby providing marked soft-tissue contrast

Clinical PET/MRI

Although all initial PET/MRI work was based on small-animal imagers, many clinicians see a promising future for PET/MRI. At least one manufacturer of medical imaging equipment is focusing on combining PET and MRI in a single device capable of simultaneous data acquisition. As a first step, a PET scanner based on LSO scintillation crystals and APDs was developed to be inserted into the imaging tunnel of a 3-T clinical MRI system (Fig. 6). Initial performance testing on phantoms as well as the

PET Attenuation Correction Based on MR Images

To achieve an accurate activity quantitation in PET, attenuation correction must be applied to the emission data to compensate for the absorption of γ-rays.44 In PET/CT, this is usually corrected by using a CT-derived attenuation-factor map.45 This is feasible because CT is based on a measure of x-ray attenuation, which is related to electron density of the stopping medium. MR, however, provides semiquantitative information on proton density. Thus, PET attenuation correction based only on MRI

Conclusion

The initial results achieved with various prototype animal PET/MRI systems as well as the first clinical PET/MRI brain-imaging devices demonstrate the feasibility of simultaneous data acquisition with negligible mutual interference between the 2 subsystems. The potential of fully integrated PET/MRI goes far beyond simple registration of morphological and functional images and holds the promise of temporal as well as spatial correlation of multiparameter functional data derived by MR

References (47)

  • J. Pfeuffer et al.

    High-field localized 1H NMR spectroscopy in the anesthetized and in the awake monkey

    Magn Reson Imaging

    (2004)
  • C. Muller-Horvat et al.

    Prospective comparison of the impact on treatment decisions of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma

    Eur J Cancer

    (2006)
  • T. Beyer et al.

    A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology

    J Nucl Med

    (2000)
  • D.W. Townsend

    A combined PET/CT scanner: The choices

    J Nucl Med

    (2001)
  • G. Antoch et al.

    Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: Comparison with CT and PET

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • R. Bar-Shalom et al.

    Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: Additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management

    J Nucl Med

    (2003)
  • C. Scarfone et al.

    Prospective feasibility trial of radiotherapy target definition for head and neck cancer using 3-dimensional PET and CT imaging

    J Nucl Med

    (2004)
  • T. Herrmann

    Radiation oncology and functional imaging

    Nuklearmedizin

    (2005)
  • A.C. Pfannenberg et al.

    Value of contrast-enhanced multi-phase CT in combined PET/CT protocols for oncological imaging

    Br J Radiol

    (2007)
  • T. Beyer et al.

    Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology

    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

    (2003)
  • K. Brechtel et al.

    Optimized contrast-enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: Technical aspects of single-phase versus multiphase CT imaging

    J Nucl Med

    (2006)
  • G.W. Goerres et al.

    PET/CT of the abdomen: Optimizing the patient breathing pattern

    Eur Radiol

    (2003)
  • G.W. Goerres et al.

    PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: Influence of respiration

    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

    (2002)
  • J.O. Barentsz et al.

    Primary staging of urinary bladder carcinoma: The role of MRI and a comparison with CT

    Eur Radiol

    (1996)
  • D.L. Kent et al.

    The clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in neuroimaging

    Ann Intern Med

    (1994)
  • R. Prabhakar et al.

    Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance based target volume in brain tumors

    J Cancer Res Ther

    (2007)
  • G. Brix et al.

    Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations

    J Nucl Med

    (2005)
  • S.R. Cherry et al.

    Optical fiber readout of scintillator arrays using a multi-channel PMT: A high resolution PET detector for animal imaging

    IEEE Trans Nucl Sci

    (1996)
  • B.J. Pichler et al.

    Performance test of a LSO-APD PET module in a 9.4 Tesla magnet

    IEEE Nucl Sci Symp

    (1997)
  • A. Nassalski et al.

    The road to the common PET/CT detector

    IEEE Trans Nucl Sci

    (2007)
  • I. Tkac et al.

    Highly resolved in vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of the mouse brain at 9.4 T

    Magn Reson Med

    (2004)
  • M.E. Casey et al.

    A multicrystal two dimensional BGO detector system for positron emission tomography

    IEEE Trans Nucl Sci

    (1986)
  • H. Ostertag et al.

    Measured attenuation correction methods

    Eur J Nucl Med

    (1989)
  • Cited by (201)

    • Hybrid Imaging of Vascular Cognitive Impairment

      2021, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text