Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 6 , Pages 450-461, November 2008

Perfusion Lung Scintigraphy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Reappraisal and Review of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis Methods

  • Massimo Miniati, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care, Section of Respiratory Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • H. Dirk Sostman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Office of the Dean, Weill Cornell Medical College and Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to H. Dirk Sostman, MD, Methodist Hospital, 6565 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030
  • ,
  • Alexander Gottschalk, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
  • ,
  • Simonetta Monti, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Massimo Pistolesi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care, Section of Respiratory Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

In this article, we review the evolution of scintigraphy for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We begin with perfusion (Q) scintigraphy, review the development of diagnostic systems that combine ventilation (V) scintigraphy and chest radiography with the Q scan, and describe in detail the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISAPED) criteria for diagnostic categorization of the Q scan read in conjunction with the chest radiograph. Finally, we review the results obtained with the PISAPED criteria in clinical research studies. The PISAPED method for lung scan interpretation provides sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing acute PE that is comparable to V/Q scanning and to computed tomography angiography (CTA), with fewer nondiagnostic results than either V/Q or CTA. The criteria can be used effectively in a diagnostic management approach that incorporates the use of a clinical prediction rule. Clinical outcomes in patients in whom PE is excluded in this way are comparable to outcomes for patients in whom the diagnosis is excluded by CTA or conventional angiography.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0001-2998(08)00078-0

doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.06.001

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 6 , Pages 450-461, November 2008