Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 6 , Pages 404-411 , November 2008

Pulmonary Embolism: A Clinician's Perspective

  • Philip S. Wells, MD, FRCP(C), MSc

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Philip S. Wells, MD, FRCP(C), MSc, Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus, Suite F6-49, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada

References 

  1. Spencer FA, Emery C, Lessard D, et al. The Worcester Venous Thromboembolism Study (A population-based study of the clinical epidemiology of venous thromboembolism). J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:722–727
  2. Anderson FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (The Worcester study). Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:933–938
  3. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, et al. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585–593
  4. Nordstrom M, Lindblad B. Autopsy-verified venous thromboembolism within a defined urban population—the city of Malmo, Sweden. APMIS. 1998;106:378–384
  5. Dismuke SE. Pulmonary embolism as a cause of death. JAMA. 1986;255:2039–2042
  6. Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: Clinical outcomes in the international cooperative pulmonary embolism registry (ICOPER). Lancet. 1999;353:1386–1389
  7. Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:809–815
  8. Heit JA, O'Fallon WM, Petterson TM, et al. Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1245–1248
  9. Schluger N, Henschke C, King T, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism at a large teaching hospital. J Thorac Imaging. 1994;9:180–184
  10. Ageno W, Agnelli G, Imberti D, et al. Factors associated with the timing of diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: Results from the MASTER registry. Thromb Res. 2008;121:751–756
  11. Roy PM, Meyer G, Vielle B, et al. Appropriateness of diagnostic management and outcomes of suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:157–164
  12. Berghout A, Oudkerk M, Hicks SG, et al. Active implementation of a consensus strategy improves diagnosis and management in suspected pulmonary embolism. QJM. 2000;93:335–340
  13. Horlander KT, Mannino DM, Leeper KV. Pulmonary embolism mortality in the United States, 1979-1998 (An analysis using multiple-cause mortality data). Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1711–1717
  14. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:997–1005
  15. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger MA, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: Management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:98–107
  16. Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, et al. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: A simple score. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:92–97
  17. Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:165–171
  18. Sohne M, Kruip MJ, Nijkeuter M. Accuracy of clinical decision rule, D-dimer and spiral computed tomography in patients with malignancy, previous venous thromboembolism, COPD or heart failure and in older patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:1042–1046
  19. van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295:172–179
  20. Penaloza A, Melot C, Dochy E, et al. Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model. Thromb Res. 2007;120:173–179
  21. Goekoop RJ, Steeghs N, Niessen RW, et al. Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells' simplified decision rule. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97:146–150
  22. Bosson JL, Barro C, Satger B, et al. Quantitative high D-dimer value is predictive of pulmonary embolism occurrence independently of clinical score in a well-defined low risk factor population. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:93–99
  23. Righini M, Le Gal G, Aujesky D, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: A randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1343–1352
  24. Kline JA, Webb WB, Jones AE, et al. Impact of a rapid rule-out protocol for pulmonary embolism on the rate of screening, missed cases, and pulmonary vascular imaging in an urban US emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:490–502
  25. Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:1247–1255
  26. Hyers TM. Venous thromboembolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:1–14
  27. PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism (Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED)). JAMA. 1990;263:2753–2759
  28. Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, et al. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2002;113:269–275
  29. Runyon MS, Webb WB, Jones AE, et al. Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: A prospective observational study. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:587–593
  30. Jackson RE, Rudoni RR, Pascual R. Emergency physician assessment of the pretest probability of pulmonary embolism. (abstr) Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:437
  31. Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Morris J, et al. Does a physician's ability to accurately assess the likelihood of pulmonary embolism increase with training?. Acad Med. 2000;75:1199–1205
  32. Richardson WS. Where do pretest probabilities come from?. ACP J Club. 1999;4:68–69
  33. Rodger MA, Maser E, Stiell I, et al. The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2005;116:101–107
  34. Wolf SJ, McCubbin TR, Feldhaus KM, et al. Prospective validation of Wells criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:503–510
  35. Gibson NS, Sohne M, Gerdes VE, et al. Further validation and simplification of the Wells clinical decision rule in pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2008;99:229–234
  36. Crowther MA, Cook DJ, Griffith LE, et al. Neither baseline tests of molecular hypercoagulability nor D-dimer levels predict deep venous thrombosis in critically ill medical-surgical patients. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:48–55
  37. Anderson DR, Rodger MA, Wells PS. Excluding pulmonary embolism with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography or ventilation-perfusion lung scanning (Letter in reply). JAMA. 2008;299:1664–1665
  38. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Douketis J, et al. An evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:812–821
  39. Leclercq MGL, Lutisan JG, van Marwijk Kooy M, et al. Ruling out clinically suspected pulmonary embolism by assessment of clinical probability and D-dimer levels: A management study. Thromb Haemost. 2003;89:97–103
  40. Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1760–1768
  41. Ghanima W, Almaas V, Aballi S, et al. Management of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) by D-dimer and multi-slice computed tomography in outpatients: An outcome study. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1926–1932
  42. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL, et al. Pulmonary embolism: Prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1997;205:447–452
  43. Le Gal G, Righini M, Sanchez O, et al. A positive compression ultrasonography of the lower limb veins is highly predictive of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography in suspected patients. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95:963–966
  44. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1992;85:462–468
  45. Hudson ER, Smith TP, McDermott VG, et al. Pulmonary angiography performed with iopamidol: Complications in 1,434 patients. Radiology. 1996;198:61–65
  46. Henry JW, Relyea B, Stein PD. Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. Chest. 1995;107:1375–1378
  47. Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:891–899
  48. Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999;353:190–195
  49. Hayashino Y, Goto M, Noguchi Y, et al. Ventilation-perfusion scanning and helical CT in suspected pulmonary embolism: Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Radiology. 2005;234:740–748
  50. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: Helical CT versus angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1369–1374
  51. Thomeer MG, Pattynama PM, Hartmann IJ, et al. High incidence of isolated subsegmental pulmonary emboli on multi-slice spiral CT: A comparative clinical study. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95:914–915
  52. Eyer BA, Goodman LR, Washington L. Clinicians' response to radiologists' reports of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism or inconclusive interpretation of pulmonary embolism using MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:623–628
  53. Bayes T. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lon. 1763;53:370–418
  54. Hull RD, Raskob GE. A new noninvasive management strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2549–2555
  55. Storto ML, Di Credico A, Guido F, et al. Incidental detection of pulmonary emboli on routine MDCT of the chest. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:264–267
  56. Gosselin MV, Rubin GD, Leung AN, et al. Unsuspected pulmonary embolism: Prospective detection on routine helical CT scans. Radiology. 1998;208:209–215
  57. Ranji SR, Shojania KG, Trowbridge RL, et al. Impact of reliance on CT Pulmonary Angiography on diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A Bayesian analysis. J Hosp Med. 2006;1:81–87
  58. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317–2327
  59. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. Reassessment of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Relation of interpreter agreement to the order of the involved Pulmonary Arterial Branch. Radiology. 1999;210:689–691
  60. Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Howarth N, Lucidarme O, et al. Contrast-Enhanced Helical CT for pulmonary embolism detection: Inter and intraobserver agreement among radiologists with variable experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:107–112
  61. Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS, et al. Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: Evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology. 2004;233:806–815
  62. Amis ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:272–284
  63. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1228–1233
  64. Cook JV, Kyriou J. Radiation from CT and perfusion scanning in pregnancy. BMJ. 2005;331:350
  65. Task Group on Control of Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography. Managing patient dose in computed tomography (A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection). Ann ICRP. 2000;30:7–45
  66. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Ann ICRP. 1998;28:1–126
  67. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–323
  68. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284
  69. Patel SJ, Reede DL, Katz DS, et al. Imaging the pregnant patient for nonobstetric conditions: Algorithms and radiation dose considerations. Radiographics. 2007;27:1705–1722
  70. Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. Radiation exposures to patients from CT: Reality, public perception, and policy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:285–287
  71. Schuster ME, Fishman JE, Copeland JF, et al. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: A survey of practices and policies for CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1495–1498
  72. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi T, Reiman RE, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:871–876
  73. Nijkeuter M, Geleijns J, De Roos A, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: Rationalizing fetal radiation exposure in radiological procedures. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:1857–1858
  74. Goodman LR, Stein PD, Matta F, et al. CT venography and compression sonography are diagnostically equivalent: Data from PIOPED II. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1071–1076
  75. Kalva SP, Jagannathan JP, Hahn PF, et al. Venous thromboembolism: Indirect CT venography during CT pulmonary angiography—should the pelvis be imaged?. Radiology. 2008;246:605–611
  76. Hunsaker AR, Zou KH, Poh AC, et al. Routine pelvic and lower extremity CT venography in patients undergoing pulmonary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:322–326
  77. Grebe MT. Combined computed tomographic (CT)-angiography and indirect CT-venography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Is more scanning better?. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97:501–502
  78. Goldenberg I, Matetzky S. Nephropathy induced by contrast media: Pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies. CMAJ. 2005;17:1461–1471
  79. Mitchell AM, Kline JA. Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:50–54
  80. Bauld DL, Kovacs MJ. Dalteparin in emergency patients to prevent admission prior to investigation for venous thromboembolism. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:11–14
  81. Humphreys CW, Moores LK, Shorr AF. Cost-minimization analysis of two algorithms for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2004;113:275–282
  82. Righini M, Nendaz M, Le Gal G, et al. Influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:1869–1877

 P.S.W. is the recipient of a Canada Research Chair in Thromboembolic Diseases.

PII: S0001-2998(08)00081-0

doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.06.004

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 6 , Pages 404-411 , November 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution