Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 1 , Pages 3-10 , January 2012

Planar Ventilation-Perfusion Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism: The Case for “Outcomes” Medicine

  • Leonard M. Freeman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY
    • Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Leonard M. Freeman, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, NY 10467
  • ,
  • Joseph E. Glaser, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY
  • ,
  • Linda B. Haramati, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY

References 

  1. Bailey DL, Roach PJ. SPECT V/Q imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:393–479
  2. Burch WM, Sullivan PJ, McLaren CJ. Technegas—A new ventilation agent for lung scanning. Nucl Med Commun. 1986;7:865–871
  3. Burch W, Senden T. Technegas. http://jcsmr.anu.edu.au/technegas/home.html2011;Accessed May 22, 2011
  4. Roach PJ, Bailey DL, Schembri GP, et al. Transition from planar to SPECT V/Q scintigraphy: Rationale, practicalities, and challenges. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:397–407
  5. Reinartz P, Wildberger JE, Schaefer W, et al. Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1501–1508
  6. Bailey DL, Schembri GP, Harris BE, et al. Generation of planar images from lung ventilation/perfusion SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:437–445
  7. Engelke C, Manstein P, Rummeny EJ, et al. Suspected and incidental pulmonary embolism on multidetector-row CT: Analysis of technical and morphological factors influencing the diagnosis in a cross-sectional cancer centre patient cohort. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:71–80
  8. Glassroth J. Imaging of pulmonary embolism: Too much of a good thing?. JAMA. 2007;298:2788–2789
  9. Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Accuracy or outcome in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2383–2385
  10. Goodman LR. Small pulmonary emboli: What do we know?. Radiology. 2005;234:654–658
  11. Burge AJ, Freeman KD, Klapper PJ, et al. Increased diagnosis of pulmonary embolism without a corresponding decline in mortality during the CT era. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:381–386
  12. Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger MA, et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298:2743–2753
  13. Stein EG, Haramati LB, Chamarthy M, et al. Success of a safe and simple algorithm to reduce use of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:392–397
  14. Freeman LM, Stein EG, Sprayregen S, et al. The current and continuing important role of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in evaluating patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:432–440
  15. Mamlouk MD, vanSonnenberg E, Gosalia R, et al. Pulmonary embolism at CT angiography: Implications for appropriateness, cost, and radiation exposure in 2003 patients. Radiology. 2010;256:625–632
  16. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317–2327
  17. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:997–1005
  18. The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism (Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED)). JAMA. 1990;263:2753–2759
  19. Carrier M, Righini M, Wells PS, et al. Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: Incidence and clinical implications (A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies). J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:1716–1722
  20. Gurney JW. No fooling around: Direct visualization of pulmonary embolism. Radiology. 1993;188:618–619
  21. Egermayer P, Town GI. The clinical significance of pulmonary embolism: Uncertainties and implications for treatment—A debate. J Intern Med. 1997;241:5–10
  22. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: Evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:831–837
  23. Sheh S, BE, Freeman KD, et al: Trends in pulmonary embolism diagnosis and mortality for CT pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy: Evidence for overdiagnosis by CT? AJR Am J Roentgenol, in press
  24. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284
  25. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. White Paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm2010;Accessed July 20, 2011
  26. Brenner DJ, Hricak H. Radiation exposure from medical imaging: Time to regulate?. JAMA. 2010;304:208–209
  27. Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:849–857
  28. Zarembo A. Cedars-Sinai radiation overdoses went unseen at several points. Los Angeles Times; 10/14/2009;
  29. Bogdanich W, Ruiz RRFDA. To Increase Oversight of Medical Radiation. New York Times, Health News; 2/9/2010;
  30. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–323
  31. Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: Implications for cancer induction. Radiology. 2007;245:742–750
  32. Pahade JK, Litmanovich D, Pedrosa I, et al. Quality initiatives: Imaging pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: What the radiologist needs to know. RadioGraphics. 2009;29:639–654
  33. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1228–1233
  34. Glaser J, Chamarthy M, Haramati LB, et al: Successful and safe implementation of a trinary interpretation and reporting strategy for v/q lung scintigraphy. J Nucl Med, in press
  35. Freeman LM, Krynyckyi B, Zuckier LS. Enhanced lung scan diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with the use of ancillary scintigraphic findings and clinical correlation. Semin Nucl Med. 2001;31:143–157
  36. Biello DR, Mattar AG, McKnight RC, et al. Ventilation-perfusion studies in suspected pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;133:1033–1037
  37. Gottschalk A, Juni JE, Sostman HD, et al. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study (part I. Data collection and tabulation). J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1109–1118
  38. Gottschalk A, Sostman HD, Coleman RE, et al. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study (Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations). J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1119–1126
  39. Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Henry JW, et al. Stratification of patients according to prior cardiopulmonary disease and probability assessment based on the number of mismatched segmental equivalent perfusion defects (Approaches to strengthen the diagnostic value of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in acute pulmonary embolism). Chest. 1993;104:1461–1467
  40. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. The addition of clinical assessment to stratification according to prior cardiopulmonary disease further optimizes the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1993;104:1472–1476
  41. Worsley DF, Kim CK, Alavi A, et al. Detailed analysis of patients with matched ventilation-perfusion defects and chest radiographic opacities. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1851–1853
  42. Bedont RA, Datz FL. Lung scan perfusion defects limited to matching pleural effusions: Low probability of pulmonary embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145:1155–1157
  43. Gottschalk A, Stein PD. Lung scan perfusion defects limited to matching pleural effusions indicate a low probability of pulmonary embolism but do not confidently exclude the diagnosis [abstr]. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:951
  44. Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. The stripe sign: A new sign for diagnosis of nonembolic defects on pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1982;142:737–741
  45. Sostman HD, Gottschalk A. Prospective validation of the stripe sign in ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1992;184:455–459
  46. Carvalho P, Lavender JP. The incidence and etiology of the ventilation/perfusion reverse mismatch defect. Clin Nucl Med. 1989;14:571–576
  47. Fuentes RT, Holmes RA. Reverse radioaerosol/radioperfusion distribution in pulmonary endobronchial obstruction. Clin Nucl Med. 1990;15:217–221
  48. Freeman LM, Haramati LB. V/Q scintigraphy: Alive, well and equal to the challenge of CT angiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:499–504
  49. Leblanc M, Léveillée F, Turcotte E. Prospective evaluation of the negative predictive value of V/Q SPECT using 99mTc-Technegas. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:667–672
  50. Gray HW, McKillop JH, Bessent RG. Lung scan reporting language: What does it mean?. Nucl Med Commun. 1993;14:1084–1087
  51. Gray HW, McKillop JH, Bessent RG. Lung scan reports: Interpretation by clinicians. Nucl Med Commun. 1993;14:989–994
  52. Chamarthy M, Glaser J, Haramati L, et al. Successful and safe implementation of a trinary interpretation and reporting strategy for V/Q lung scintigraphy [abstr 41]. J Nucleus Med Meeting Abstracts. 2010;(suppl 2):51
  53. Miles S, Rogers KM, Thomas P, et al. A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2009;136:1546–1553
  54. Freeman LM, Zelefsky MN, Kaplan N, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with scanning and angiographic techniques—A correlative study. J Nucl Med. 1968;9:394–401
  55. Sabiston DC, Wagner HN. The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by radioisotope scanning. Ann Surg. 1964;160:575–588
  56. Quinn JL, Whitlery JE. Lung scintiscanning. Radiology. 1964;83:917
  57. Wagner HN, Sabiston DC, Iio M, et al. Regional pulmonary blood flow in man by radioisotope scanning. JAMA. 1964;187:601–603
  58. Wagner HN, Sabiston DC, McAfee JG, et al. Diagnosis of massive pulmonary embolism in man by radioisotope scanning. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:377–384

PII: S0001-2998(11)00094-8

doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.07.003

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 1 , Pages 3-10 , January 2012