Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 1 , Pages 11-26, January 2012

The Bone Scan

  • Arnold I. Brenner, DO, MMM, CPE

      Affiliations

    • Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Arnold I. Brenner, DO, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10305
  • ,
  • June Koshy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY
  • ,
  • Jose Morey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY
  • ,
  • Cheryl Lin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY
  • ,
  • Jason DiPoce, MD

      Affiliations

    • Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY

Bone imaging continues to be the second greatest-volume nuclear imaging procedure, offering the advantage of total body examination, low cost, and high sensitivity. Its power rests in the physiological uptake and pathophysiologic behavior of 99m technetium (99m-Tc) diphosphonates. The diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of 99m-Tc bone imaging for benign conditions and tumors was established when only planar imaging was available. Currently, nearly all bone scans are performed as a planar study (whole-body, 3-phase, or regional), with the radiologist often adding single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. Here we review many current indications for planar bone imaging, highlighting indications in which the planar data are often diagnostically sufficient, although diagnosis may be enhanced by SPECT. 18F sodium fluoride positron emission tomography (PET) is also re-emerging as a bone agent, and had been considered interchangeable with 99m-Tc diphosphonates in the past. In addition to SPECT, new imaging modalities, including 18F fluorodeoxyglucose, PET/CT, CT, magnetic resonance, and SPECT/CT, have been developed and can aid in evaluating benign and malignant bone disease. Because 18F fluorodeoxyglucose is taken up by tumor cells and Tc diphosphonates are taken up in osteoblastic activity or osteoblastic healing reaction, both modalities are complementary. CT and magnetic resonance may supplement, but do not replace, bone imaging, which often detects pathology before anatomic changes are appreciated. We also stress the importance of dose reduction by reducing the dose of 99m-Tc diphosphonates and avoiding unnecessary CT acquisitions. In addition, we describe an approach to image interpretation that emphasizes communication with referring colleagues and correlation with appropriate history to significantly improve our impact on patient care.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0001-2998(11)00096-1

doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.07.005

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Volume 42, Issue 1 , Pages 11-26, January 2012